3 ms·
I agree entirely with what you're saying, right up until your final question: > why bother grinding through all the material of climbing Mt. Everest and then a
by tmhn2 24d ago
I agree entirely with what you're saying, right up until your final question:
> why bother grinding through all the material of climbing Mt. Everest and then attempting it if the helicopter ride is how things are done now?
I think you answered this yourself earlier:
> I think progress is really measured by what humans are able to do and understand
People want to make this progress. Therefore people will "grind Everest" as a mathematical community, and that is maybe not so hugely different from a lot of previous mathematical work.
There's still ample room for creativity: simplifying, generalizing, asking new questions humans are interested in, ...
- _superposition_ 24d agoThat grind is emotional. And it's something AI will never have. The desire to solve a problem.
- unknownunknown7 24d agoCitation needed. Who are you to say large enough clusters of neurons can't develo emotions?
- _superposition_ 18d agoWho are you to say they can? I would think the burden of proof is on you to promote an inanimate object to an emotional entity. Otherwise we are truly lost.