2 ms·
Alpha lowers the expected level of polish and stability - it doesn't make every regression equally acceptable. It is a reasonable criticism even when released t
by gib444 21d ago
Alpha lowers the expected level of polish and stability - it doesn't make every regression equally acceptable. It is a reasonable criticism even when released to the alpha channel.
Further, I believe it's reasonable for users' expectations to be influenced by what the project itself communicates about the development process.
> People sometimes.
I have experienced many (relatively minor but some annoying) bugs in GrapheneOS the past few years, without complaint to the developers. And have submitted bug reports and logs. I'm "in the trenches", not just slinging mud from the outside. If I were in a better financial situation right now, I would be donating too.
- getpokedagain 21d agoThis is somewhat true. I expect more regressions from released commercial software. I suspect there are fewer regressions per release on graphenes alpha messenger than there are in googles message's app.
- gib444 21d agoYou make a good point: as a project becomes more commercialised, you can expect regressions like this.
- jasonvorhe 21d agoConflicts with the common definitions of alpha versions I'm familiar with but definitions differ, of course. Glad you're not among the gOS haters though!
- gib444 21d agoPointing out regressions wouldn't make someone a hater. That would be a nonsense accusation and a childish conclusion to draw.
- jasonvorhe 20d agoAgreed. But your now flagged and no longer viewable post seemed to chime into the whole "GrapheneOS is using AI, they must be shipping slop" trend in certain circles.