3 ms·

It's easy to ignore now. Are the changes Omarchy specific or distro-agnostic? You say both. I don't even know what hyperland and quickshell are. I don't use m

by bakies 15d ago

It's easy to ignore now. Are the changes Omarchy specific or distro-agnostic? You say both. I don't even know what hyperland and quickshell are. I don't use mise because it seems to solve problems I solve with containers.

stryan 15d ago
> Are the changes Omarchy specific or distro-agnostic? You say both. The changes are specifically for Omarchy. They just happen to still be distro-agnostic. There is no guarantee this continues in the future. The discussions: Using managed tool-stub bundles for Omarchy’s lazy CLI layer: https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12597 https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12597 Proposal: give every Omarchy user a declarative "my machine" file with mise bootstrap: https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12709 https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12709 Proposal: give Omarchy dotfiles automatic history, easy restore, and optional sync with mise: https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/13022 https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/13022 > I don't even know what hyperland and quickshell are. I don't use mise because it seems to solve problems I solve with containers. Okay? Your lack of awareness of the tools does not change the fact that 15 millions dollars that is supposed to "support the linux desktop", but right now is mostly funding its own distro.
- bakies 14d ago
  Seems like a waste on these tools anyway
- machomaster 14d ago
  > 15 millions dollars that is supposed to "support the linux desktop", but right now is mostly funding its own distro. There is no general destination to support Linux Desktop. Linux Foundation is not that, in addition to having more money than they need, and spending less than 5% of their budget on actual kernel. The only way to support Linux and its desktop is to support individual project. Be they separate or part of some distro. That's the beauty of Linux and open-source - all the features and efforts are dynamically leaking elsewhere in the ecosystem. DHH never promised to support outside projects. Omarchy Foundation is supposed to support Linux via developing Omarchy, putting all the money there, not by having a tax-evation foundation with high-paid executives, distributing a tiny percentage of the budget to some general unmeasurable cause. Hence why DHH supports Hyprland and not Niri. He said that directly.

by bakies 15d ago

stryan 15d ago

> Are the changes Omarchy specific or distro-agnostic? You say both. The changes are specifically for Omarchy. They just happen to still be distro-agnostic. There is no guarantee this continues in the future. The discussions: Using managed tool-stub bundles for Omarchy’s lazy CLI layer: https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12597 https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12597 Proposal: give every Omarchy user a declarative "my machine" file with mise bootstrap: https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12709 https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/12709 Proposal: give Omarchy dotfiles automatic history, easy restore, and optional sync with mise: https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/13022 https://github.com/jdx/mise/discussions/13022 > I don't even know what hyperland and quickshell are. I don't use mise because it seems to solve problems I solve with containers. Okay? Your lack of awareness of the tools does not change the fact that 15 millions dollars that is supposed to "support the linux desktop", but right now is mostly funding its own distro.

bakies 14d ago
Seems like a waste on these tools anyway
machomaster 14d ago
> 15 millions dollars that is supposed to "support the linux desktop", but right now is mostly funding its own distro. There is no general destination to support Linux Desktop. Linux Foundation is not that, in addition to having more money than they need, and spending less than 5% of their budget on actual kernel. The only way to support Linux and its desktop is to support individual project. Be they separate or part of some distro. That's the beauty of Linux and open-source - all the features and efforts are dynamically leaking elsewhere in the ecosystem. DHH never promised to support outside projects. Omarchy Foundation is supposed to support Linux via developing Omarchy, putting all the money there, not by having a tax-evation foundation with high-paid executives, distributing a tiny percentage of the budget to some general unmeasurable cause. Hence why DHH supports Hyprland and not Niri. He said that directly.