4 ms·
Are you implying that OpenAI using someones unpublished research without their permission to solve an career defining math problem with their latest model in or
by TSiege 25d ago
Are you implying that OpenAI using someones unpublished research without their permission to solve an career defining math problem with their latest model in order to publish first is a problem with the mathematicians?
My read on this document is that people's work isn't being fairly cited more than what does it mean to be a mathematician in this age.
- nautilus12 25d agoThis is the real issue, though this article does not really hit on it explicitly just alludes to it.
- TSiege 25d agoYes I think they should be more direct. Not sure why they weren't
- kenjackson 25d agoI didn't know this article was about that issue at all. Yeah, if the issue is properly citing work then yes, OpenAI needs to do that. But the article read like it was tackling a completely different issue.
- pred_ 25d agoThat's one of several issues, obviously a big one, and they do touch on it: > Often these solutions are announced in a rush, leaving no time for a proper writeup, the isolation of new methods and ideas, and citing relevant previous work of others. As in all creative professions, this raises severe attribution and plagiarism questions.
- kenjackson 24d agoYes. I forgot about that section. That is probably the one thing that the AI companies can and should do better on.
- famouswaffles 25d ago>Are you implying that OpenAI using someones unpublished research without their permission to solve an career defining math problem Good thing they never did that then