> nothing significant has changed Stating that the availability of intellectual products (which is not even what you have stated, you speak of «reliable inform

> nothing significant has changed Stating that the availability of intellectual products (which is not even what you have stated, you speak of «reliable information» and that is a different world already, but I am instead talking about the availability of "good reasoning") had little impact is not only difficult to prove in general, but clearly false given one's experience. We have had great Teachers, often through paper. The availability of Greatness makes a world of a difference. > how two intelligent beings ... may not agree ... you completely ignored this point I wrote «assessors with optimal instruments must ideally converge towards a fair assessment». > you have a fixed idea in your mind It remains a condition in analytical discussion that such alleged idea is clearly expressed in a well constructed statement. I have in fact no idea what «fixed idea» you are attacking: this is what I reiterated many times. Repeat: «You should go back to the analytical and formulate explicit statements that you have identified as targets. (If we had the time and space - here, it is probably not the case.)»