3 ms·
They are addressing the fact that no bad actor will care to make it, not that they can't. Sure, there are countless ways it could be abused, and you point out
by eks391 15d ago
They are addressing the fact that no bad actor will care to make it, not that they can't.
Sure, there are countless ways it could be abused, and you point out some, but what had actor will want to pursue even one? They gain nothing. And good actors only lose out, in the form of lost credibility and future audience. Therefore it doesn't get abused and a fix isn't needed.
The last 15 years is evidence of the argument.
- alt227 15d agoIm arguing against the parent point that "Site freezes machine, user stops going to site." Its a gross oversimplification, and it doesnt hold water becasue there are lots of other vectors to a user coming across this than just "oh I recognise that web address as bad so I wont go there". > but what had actor will want to pursue even one? They gain nothing Ask that to anyone who has ever rickrolled somebody.