> they are very strongly tuned to value code that has no errors which can be picked up by linters or similar, while humans work the opposite way This is a real

> they are very strongly tuned to value code that has no errors which can be picked up by linters or similar, while humans work the opposite way This is a really valuable insight! It resonates well with my own experience revewing AI-authored code: I look hard at interfaces, architecture and performance, and merely glance over code that just "gets the job done", because if it works, I'm not worried about it. Now I can express that dichotomy much more clearly -- thank you!