> I think in general, any game that is 'turn-based' (in this case chess), with a limited set of options, quickly boils down to pure theory and in my opinion 'du

> I think in general, any game that is 'turn-based' (in this case chess), with a limited set of options, quickly boils down to pure theory and in my opinion 'dumb intelligence' of just remembering many things and patterns (the AI of now). That's perhaps true for full information, two player games. Try Diplomacy for a change. (Even if you play without explicit negotiations and only have the moves speak for themselves.)