3 ms·
Yes, that contributes to the "if it actually worked" sentiment. It doesn't have to be slow, if the browser exposed C-like ABI for DOM access and web APIs like
by apatheticonion 24d ago
Yes, that contributes to the "if it actually worked" sentiment.
It doesn't have to be slow, if the browser exposed C-like ABI for DOM access and web APIs like LocalStorage, the FileSystem API, ServiceWorker, etc - Rust bindings can be made and that boundary could be well optimised.
All we need is;
<script type="application/wasm" src="./main.wasm"></script>
The rest is just browser optimisations.