As with all press releases I assume it was written/re viewed/redacted by their lawyers, so: > no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem

As with all press releases I assume it was written/re viewed/redacted by their lawyers, so: > no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem Data was accessed in order to <other purpose> (and then accidentally used in training) Also, is llm’s answer to the prompt actually “user data”? > We did not use their prompts or proofs … So they used llm’s answers to those prompts. > … to prompt our models or directew our agents. So they trained the model on it. (Training is not prompting and plain model is not an agent)