2 ms·
Oh they aren't a frontier on this. Undoing user configuration is well tested in Windows land.
by xboxnolifes 1mo ago
Oh they aren't a frontier on this. Undoing user configuration is well tested in Windows land.
- mcmcmc 1mo agoThis is a problem everywhere, Apple does the same thing on MacOS by reverting privacy/security grants to apps
- threetonesun 1mo agoReverting... to on? I've seen some stuff in Apple-land where I'm pretty sure it went back to the default option after an update but I've never seen anything get granted more permissions.
- mcmcmc 1mo agoNo, like specific apps that have been granted full disk access etc lose their permissions. It’s hell for IT, constantly breaks AV. I would not characterize that as reverting to a default. More often it’s a breaking change for how the security model works that ends up requiring reauthorization
- threetonesun 1mo agoAh, sure, it's annoying but it's never giving new permissions you didn't give it before. And yes "revert to default" is probably not what's happening, but reverting to forcing a specific permission grant when the existing one was superceeded or replaced.
- mcmcmc 1mo agoFair, it’s still an example of them not respecting user configuration
- lbreakjai 1mo agoI understand the rationale. The app you granted full disk access three months ago might have significantly changed. You can't reset the permissions for a given app after every update, as you might end up prompting the user three times per week.
- croon 1mo agoThe alternative would be keeping a permission granted for an app that might have had an update introducing nefarious behavior, whether intentional or not. Annoying yes, but least bad.
- Yizahi 1mo ago"Remember my choice", right?:)