3 ms·
Fundamentally, doesn't gambling require a potential payout that is more valuable than the initial input? If you can only ever get less than you put in that's no
by skinfaxi 24d ago
Fundamentally, doesn't gambling require a potential payout that is more valuable than the initial input? If you can only ever get less than you put in that's not really a gamble is it?
- bluefirebrand 24d agoIt's still a gamble, just a really bad one for you
- 9x39 24d agoOne well-known definition of gambling is whether it has 3 components: a prize, runs on chance, and requires consideration (payment). That consideration > prize isn't part of this common definition.