4 ms·

> It is way cheaper long term. I would think this is only true if you watch a small number of shows and rewatch them often

by ChrisRR 25d ago

bakies 25d ago
They're $20-50 for complete series on dvd on Amazon right now. That's 14-35 new shows to get every year for the same price. I believe it's cheaper. This is why so many companies push subscriptions. If DVDs made them more money than they'd be pushing you to buy them.
- wiether 25d ago
  Are you really buying and watching DVDs in 2026? I bought some complete series in DVD in the past but, even putting aside the inconvenience of having to manage discs in the player, there's the quality issue. I got my 1080p copies on the high seas and that's just a whole different experience.
  - basscomm 25d ago
    > Are you really buying and watching DVDs in 2026? > I got my 1080p copies on the high seas and that's just a whole different experience. There's _a lot_ of stuff that has only ever been available in SD (or equivalent). Some of it was shot on film that could maybe be remastered, but that costs money. Some of the older/less popular stuff wouldn't be profitable if it was remastered (assuming remastering is even possible). > even putting aside the inconvenience of having to manage discs in the player You're allowed to rip media that you bought
  - bakies 24d ago
    No I'm not, but I'm slowly being convinced to. I've started listening to the radio, tape, and records. I don't really consider that inconvenience. Radio is actually more convenient than streaming, it's made me listen to more music.
sejje 25d ago
This strategy could at least amass a huge horde of older media (which I think still constitutes the bulk of GOOD media), if combined with thrift stores, for very cheap. Probably you could profit during the buying & selling of the media. They all have piles of audiobooks, audio cds, dvds, a blu-rays for $1-$2 each. Sometimes big boxes at yard sales for a few bucks.

> It is way cheaper long term. I would think this is only true if you watch a small number of shows and rewatch them often

by ChrisRR 25d ago

> It is way cheaper long term. I would think this is only true if you watch a small number of shows and rewatch them often

bakies 25d ago

They're $20-50 for complete series on dvd on Amazon right now. That's 14-35 new shows to get every year for the same price. I believe it's cheaper. This is why so many companies push subscriptions. If DVDs made them more money than they'd be pushing you to buy them.

wiether 25d ago
Are you really buying and watching DVDs in 2026? I bought some complete series in DVD in the past but, even putting aside the inconvenience of having to manage discs in the player, there's the quality issue. I got my 1080p copies on the high seas and that's just a whole different experience.
- basscomm 25d ago
  > Are you really buying and watching DVDs in 2026? > I got my 1080p copies on the high seas and that's just a whole different experience. There's _a lot_ of stuff that has only ever been available in SD (or equivalent). Some of it was shot on film that could maybe be remastered, but that costs money. Some of the older/less popular stuff wouldn't be profitable if it was remastered (assuming remastering is even possible). > even putting aside the inconvenience of having to manage discs in the player You're allowed to rip media that you bought
- bakies 24d ago
  No I'm not, but I'm slowly being convinced to. I've started listening to the radio, tape, and records. I don't really consider that inconvenience. Radio is actually more convenient than streaming, it's made me listen to more music.

sejje 25d ago

This strategy could at least amass a huge horde of older media (which I think still constitutes the bulk of GOOD media), if combined with thrift stores, for very cheap. Probably you could profit during the buying & selling of the media. They all have piles of audiobooks, audio cds, dvds, a blu-rays for $1-$2 each. Sometimes big boxes at yard sales for a few bucks.