3 ms·
I haven't tried it personally but my understanding from friends is that Pangram is very accurate, at least for now. https://www.pangram.com/ https://www.pangra
by zrail 25d ago
I haven't tried it personally but my understanding from friends is that Pangram is very accurate, at least for now.
https://www.pangram.com/ https://www.pangram.com/
- walrus01 25d agoAs a paid service it probably works great. In the spirit of weaponizing vibecoded slop vs vibecoded slop, I'm fairly sure that I could 'teach' locally hosted Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next to identify vibe coded slop, with a thorough enough system prompt and access to like, playwright and headless chromium. Or since a lot of vibe coded static sites are just plain html, cs, js, a first try attempt via wget to mirror the first 500KB of the site and then analyze it.
- _joel 25d agoIronic that site looks like it's AI generated too
- koito17 25d agoIt looks close to the kind of documentation artifacts GPT 5.6 Sol would generate for me. That style is still rare enough that I prefer it over OP's "we installed shadcn + Tailwind and look like every seed-stage startup SaaS from 2024" style.