4 ms·
OH! Sorry - that's a different position then. Let's address it: So you think a computer can't simulate a human brain. But why do you think so? We've never
by qarl 1mo ago
OH! Sorry - that's a different position then. Let's address it:
So you think a computer can't simulate a human brain.
But why do you think so? We've never found a physical system we can't simulate with a computer (and believe me, Searle and Penrose have tried).
Given there's no evidence that this is even possible, and for which you have no evidence to support it - you still believe computers can't simulate brains?
Why?
I think this is an even greater stretch than before.
- GPerson 1mo agoI have given my reasons. I will try again. You are fundamentally assuming all real concepts are reducible to arbitrary substrates like language. I believe there are real concepts which are not, like qualia. The entire premise of your belief is on this assumption I think but I don’t think you are aware that there is in fact an assumption here.
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- qarl 1mo ago[dead]