3 ms·
my point of view is simple: anyone who thinks "woke" is a valid counterargument is not worth listening to
by croisillon 17d ago
my point of view is simple:
anyone who thinks "woke" is a valid counterargument is not worth listening to
- hagbard_c 16d agoDoes that include those like the mentioned politica who espouses the virtues of the next iteration of 'woke' because the first version was craaaazy? If so I do applaud you, it is indeed and best left to the historians for dissection. If not, why not?
- croisillon 15d agoglad to learn that you suddenly embrace any kind of compassion and solidarity, in the form of what you call the next iteration of woke
- hagbard_c 15d agoI cannot help but notice that you did not answer my question. What about is? Also it isn't me who refers to ${whatever} as the next generation of woke, it is implied by those who refer to the past madness as woke 1.0. Where there is a 1.0 there is soon to be a 2.0, or maybe a 1.1, who knows.