5 ms·
Instant in-memory transcription likely isn't legally considered the same as storing the actual audio. It probably couldn't be used as proof in a court like audi
by tencentshill 25d ago
Instant in-memory transcription likely isn't legally considered the same as storing the actual audio. It probably couldn't be used as proof in a court like audio could (for now...).
- cael450 25d agoProbably not, but contemporaneous notes have their own value legally.