2 ms·
> Ignoring this reality is part of other concerns. So you meant: "we are already at a point in which many humans can be non-competitive in the professional ma
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> Ignoring this reality
is part of other concerns.
So you meant: "we are already at a point in which many humans can be non-competitive in the professional market". Yes. We were still there some time ago already.
- dinfinity 1mo agoI did not mean that, but I'll take it as agreement that we've already achieved AGI if that is defined as being on average more intelligent than average humans.
- mdp2021 1mo agoIf you wanted to be sure and date that: it happened around the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025 - check Maxim Lott's trackingai.org . But, again (and again), that which you propose cannot be a productive definition of AGI. In engineering we strive to understand "Fast", then to implement it, and then obtain "faster than a cheetah" - not "faster than a roadkill", which is really not a goal. > more intelligent than average humans Adequate language and ideas, please: one probably does not have actual intelligence, the other probably does not use it.