3 ms·
I can't get over how Apple is getting everyone to refer to them with proper pluralization, ie AirPods 5 vs AirPod 5's.
by _whiteCaps_ 24d ago
I can't get over how Apple is getting everyone to refer to them with proper pluralization, ie AirPods 5 vs AirPod 5's.
- avree 24d agoThe first version was "Apple AirPods", there's two of them so it makes sense.
- dylan604 24d agoI would never have considered 5's. Are you implying the five is in possession of something?
- _whiteCaps_ 24d agoI'm saying that many people do it wrong in other cases, and stick an 's' on the end (or worse, also add an apostrophe). Like surgeon generals, attorney generals, court martials, etc. I'm impressed that people aren't doing it in the case of airpods.
- macintux 24d agoMy lone claim to fame, now harder to track down because Twitter decided my lack of activity was somehow suspicious and killed my account, was a brief exchange with Phil Schiller about pluralization of Apple devices. > One need never pluralize Apple product names. Ex: Mr. Evans used two iPad Pro devices. https://www.iphoneantidote.com/blog/dont-pluralize/ https://www.iphoneantidote.com/blog/dont-pluralize/