> I think you're conflating different requirements/usecases. I disagree. protoculture's core statement seems to be: A lot of people think VMWare Workstation

> I think you're conflating different requirements/usecases. I disagree. protoculture's core statement seems to be: A lot of people think VMWare Workstation is the pinnacle product of the company and I have NFI how this came to be. A company's pinnacle product can be completely useless to me, but that doesn't change the fact that the products of theirs that I do use are very simple and unimpressive when compared to it. [0] Having said that, I expect that a lot of people think Vmware Workstation is Vmware's pinnacle product because they've never heard of vSphere, ESXi, or anything else the company has made. "People have no knowledge of like 95% of what most companies do." is always a solid first guess when trying to work out confusion like protoculture's. [0] Please spare me the "But how can it be a pinnacle product if it's not useful to you?" retort and ones like it. I've deliberately made a distinction between a product's usefulness to me personally and the sophistication of that product.