2 ms·

It was not intended aggressively, but rather rhetorically. We are not racing against each other, but if you intend to be 'good' at something, you are in a compe

It was not intended aggressively, but rather rhetorically. We are not racing against each other, but if you intend to be 'good' at something, you are in a competition with a great many other. If you find excuses not to improve yourself, you will definitely not be 'good'. If you practiced basketball every day for the next year, and enjoyed doing that, you'd be an excellent basketball player after that year. That you couldn't make it as a pro doesn't detract anything from that. There's a near infinite amount of things every single one of us could do if they wanted to. The only problem is that we usually do not want to. The number of things that you truly can't do because it depends on some physical characteristic is fairly limited. You could be a physics professor, an awesome captain, an excellent stock broker or a locally successful artist. You are just not interested in any of those things.

diego 14y ago
When I was a teenager I wanted to be a world-class runner. I trained as hard and as methodically as I could for three years. I could never break a five-minute mile. I was mediocre, and slower than guys who barely trained but had bodies more suited to running. I still run 25 years later, but just for fun. Perhaps I could run a three-hour marathon if I really cared, but that's far from great. Note that this is completely unrelated to the enjoyment you derive from the activity. If you want to be great at something, you have to pick your battles and play to your strengths. Some people just cannot be great programmers no matter how hard they try. Most people can be great at something if they try hard enough, but most people cannot be great at programming. That was the point that you seem to miss.