3 ms·
Oh why can't this idea die, it has been continuously debunked for 6 years now. So much so, any TW discussion will reiterate it.
by gherkinnn 24d ago
Oh why can't this idea die, it has been continuously debunked for 6 years now. So much so, any TW discussion will reiterate it.
- benoau 24d agoWhy would it die? How would it die? The vast majority of Tailwind is literally just shorthand for individual CSS properties.
- albedoa 24d agoOh ya? Is that why the parent prefaced that obvious and indisputable fact with "IMO"?
- gherkinnn 24d agoBecause what makes it useful , like media queries, can't be put in style attributes. Frankly this whole discussion is just as silly as claiming flex has nothing over table layout.
- zelphirkalt 24d agoThen again one should aim to not even need media queries and make things responsive intrinsically, breakpoint-free, continuously. A design where things jump at hard coded viewport widths is not actually a great design. So at least that part is not so amazing.
- gherkinnn 24d ago>inb4 my 1:1 naive mapping of DB to screen works for me >inb4 the web should be reserved for text documents and hyperlinks and user styles rule and running anything close to applications on the web was a mistake >inb4 TUI
- dalmo3 24d agoThis is certainly one of the arguments of all time. Thank you, HN.
- albedoa 24d agoNever stop posting, you are doing great.
- slopinthebag 24d agobro your own website has hard coded viewport widths where things jump
- zelphirkalt 24d agoIf you were so kind to point out, where I used media queries to hardcode viewport width ... "bro".
- vlyan 24d agoflex is not a collection of aliases for <td>s and <tr>s
- lucumo 24d ago> Oh why can't this idea die People like to feel superior to others, so dunking on people using a popular technology tickles some pleasure centers. Considering another viewpoint gets in the way of that, so other viewpoints are ignored.