> I really, really disagree with that statement. But you're wrong, although not for the reasons you think (suggested by your examples). > I don’t think ai mod

> I really, really disagree with that statement. But you're wrong, although not for the reasons you think (suggested by your examples). > I don’t think ai models come close to nuclear weapons Unless AI models are controlling the drones/icbms carrying those. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/18/autonomous-drones-and-the-future-of-war-in-an-ai-driven-world https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/18/autonomou... > or to run-of-the-mill, everyday carbon emissions Unless AI models are responsible for those said emissions. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/amazon-funds-biggest-gas-power-plant-in-us-despite-climate-pledge/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/amazon-funds-big... > What’s the most dangerous thing that’s happened with an LLM so far? That it's built solely on "trust me, bro"? > right now I am not concerned at all. You should be. There's no scenario where this ends well: if AI labs succeed, we all will loose our jobs. If they fail, then the bubble bursts. Economic crisis is inevitable either way, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.