3 ms·
> if someone was 100% certain This is unreasonable because nobody can know 100% certain that the AI built at Anthropic will kill everyone. It is also a big-ass
by dinfinity 17d ago
> if someone was 100% certain
This is unreasonable because nobody can know 100% certain that the AI built at Anthropic will kill everyone. It is also a big-ass strawman because the author never claimed he was 100% certain that AI will kill all humans. You're arguing from an irrelevant hypothetical (in which, I might add, most people would still not automatically change into murderous psychopaths as you apparently think is normal).
> Horse Shit. Here's what was written
It's a whole thread, my man. And nowhere does it say "omg I’m quitting they’re going to kill everyone". Read the entire thread again and then say with a straight face that the gist of it is "omg I’m quitting they’re going to kill everyone".
- ericmay 17d ago> This is unreasonable because nobody can know 100% certain that the AI built at Anthropic will kill everyone. It is also a big-ass strawman because the author never claimed he was 100% certain that AI will kill all humans. Ok then stop arguing about my hypothetical if you don't want to engage with it. Those of us who are interested in talking about it can do so in peace without distracting comments. > change into murderous psychopaths as you apparently think is normal Please stop engaging in this hyperbole and go find some other axe to grind. > It's a whole thread, my man. I took a direct quote from the thread where earlier you accused me of pedaling in sensationalism and "not reading".
- dinfinity 17d agoI'm not the one reacting to reasonable behavior with some edgy comment containing broken logic. The author of the Twitter thread is not some egotistical attention seeker and never said "omg I’m quitting they’re going to kill everyone". His logic for quitting his job and not acting like a psychopath is sound. Yours is not.
- ericmay 17d agoI've already explained the matter to my satisfaction.