3 ms·
It's 1) the WSJ and 2) a really dubious headline I don't find it surprising or disappointing that ppl aren't bothering to go read the article because of the tw
by oska 24d ago
It's 1) the WSJ and 2) a really dubious headline
I don't find it surprising or disappointing that ppl aren't bothering to go read the article because of the two factors in conjunction above
- SideburnsOfDoom 24d ago3) article is paywalled. Yeah, I know they can be bypassed, but it's yet more friction, not worth it for a really dubious headline.