4 ms·
I don't think your reading is correct. ML history is related with examples of models using hints from side channels. If it would be possible to replicate OpenA
by angry_octet 17d ago
I don't think your reading is correct. ML history is related with examples of models using hints from side channels.
If it would be possible to replicate OpenAIs success with a model cut-off earlier than the rumours, and without hinting from informed mathematicians, then we can consider it original. Otherwise it's indefensible.
- jdm2212 17d agoBy Buckmaster's own account, OpenAI (a) wanted him and Alpoge to publish their Euler result first and (b) wanted Buckmaster to author the Navier-Stokes paper, and (c) when he refused both of those, tried to get Alpoge to talk him into it. Why would OpenAI go burn another $20 million trying to prove they didn't accidentally train on synthetic data derived from Buckmaster's codex sessions? They're desperately trying to give him credit anyway!