> but if you intend to indict a man, you'll need much stricter standards than this. I don't want to indict anyone. I am not a judge or prosecutor. I am saying

> but if you intend to indict a man, you'll need much stricter standards than this. I don't want to indict anyone. I am not a judge or prosecutor. I am saying that my own moral shortcomings do not justify his. > Before long you'll convince yourself that you're the only decent man around and the rest are less-than-human. There is this kinda old book that has some stories in it. I never got to read the whole thing back-to-back, but the Cliff's Notes of it is pretty much that we all are imperfect beings, that we are not able to fix everything on our own and that the best we can do is to recognize and forgive the mistakes we all made. > it is a terribly dangerous game to begin judging a man's choices when you know nothing about him. Love the sinner, hate the sin. I don't need to know anything about a person working for Facebook to know that the product of their labor is bad for society. Saying "this thing you are doing is evil" is NOT the same as saying "you are an evil person". People will end up creating all sorts of rationalizations for their actions, especially when their identities are attached to it. If we don't call out on evil, then it becomes accepted.