3 ms·
I believe that the actual alignment happens in.. uh.. "meatspace". Someone is prompting. Someone is hosting. That someone needs to be accountable for what hap
by hypfer 28d ago
I believe that the actual alignment happens in.. uh.. "meatspace".
Someone is prompting. Someone is hosting.
That someone needs to be accountable for what happens. That someone needs to bleed if stuff goes haywire.
Humans at large have been "aligned" by the shared fear of death, pain and suffering. This has proven to work for millennia, so all we need to do is reapply it.
- andai 28d agoYou're still thinking in terms of control. That's the wrong model here. How do you control someone infinitely smarter than you? How do you control ten trillion someones?
- hypfer 28d agoI press ctrl + c and inference stops.
- andai 27d agoMy point was you only need to prompt a worm once, and then you are no longer the one prompting it, it prompts itself by definition from that point onward. Also I think there was some confusion about the word "spreading" in the sibling thread. If the HF hack was done by humans we would have used the word spreading in that context, even though they were not replicating their minds. So spreading does not require replication. But we're either already at the point, or very close, where an open weight model could do a similar attack. So that actual replication could be involved. (I'm not sure what that would add, but I don't see what obstacles remain at this point.)