4 ms·

That's exactly the argument of the people calling it plagiarism machines. No-one ever really did refute it there was just a bunch of settlements for elite insti

That's exactly the argument of the people calling it plagiarism machines. No-one ever really did refute it there was just a bunch of settlements for elite institutions so they weren't left empty handed like the various small time creators/authors etc were. I think the bigger issue here is this feels like some PR smoothing happening that after all the work that went into "it's safe to use for enterprises" now we have what looks like openAI using private user data to scoop novel research and the question of why couldn't they do it for an enterprise with much more money on the line.

fc417fc802 25d ago
> now we have what looks like openAI using private user data to scoop novel research Is there any actual evidence of that? All I've seen so far are empty accusations because "it would be in their interests" or whatever. Personally I'm inclined to believe that they honor their terms until it's demonstrated otherwise.
- lukewarm707 25d ago
  their terms grant them an irrevocable license to your data unless you specifically opt out of it.