I have seen this argument on HN before with respect to similar scenarios involving so-called "tech" companies acting as intermediaries I don't think it's convi

I have seen this argument on HN before with respect to similar scenarios involving so-called "tech" companies acting as intermediaries I don't think it's convincing If this submission and this thread are any indication, it appears the "reputation" that CF customers care about has nothing to do with privacy. It relates to price, ease of use, reliability, etc. The fact is businesses do "tolerate it" For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudbleed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudbleed The MITM design of CF is what it is It creates risks, but these risks are tolerated