3 ms·
> I don’t think ai models come close to nuclear weapons or to run-of-the-mill, everyday carbon emissions in terms of danger to humanity. Nuclear weapons don’t
by foogazi 24d ago
> I don’t think ai models come close to nuclear weapons or to run-of-the-mill, everyday carbon emissions in terms of danger to humanity.
Nuclear weapons don’t have AI but AI can have nuclear weapons
- riffraff 24d agoAbstractly, yes but concretely, how? Many terrorist organizations would like to have a nuclear bomb, but don't.
- asdff 24d ago"Department of War has announced a new partnership with blablalbablalba-AI..." World ends shortly thereafter.
- petesergeant 24d ago> Abstractly, yes but concretely, how? AI has the capability to perform any function that can be performed over a network. You would hope that every system that can launch a nuke is properly and actually totally air-gapped, but there are lots of things you'd hope that turn out to not be true.
- Ekaros 24d agoThey are not totally. As such I would give non zero chance of even current AI to be able to socially manipulate a launch after sufficient hype up period... So prolonged campaign might make it possible.
- petesergeant 24d agoAnd even if they are, agents are able to place calls with a fake voice to random phone numbers…