4 ms·
That’s a pretty pessimistic outlook. You should optimize for the longer term, not just the next 6 months. Someone who isn’t talented not only does a disservic
by andsoitis 1mo ago
That’s a pretty pessimistic outlook.
You should optimize for the longer term, not just the next 6 months.
Someone who isn’t talented not only does a disservice to the work, but also brings down the effectiveness of the rest of the team.
- cloche 1mo agoYou shouldn't always optimize for the long term. You should optimize for the reality of the environment that you're in. In large, public companies, that usually means looking ahead normally 1-2 quarters unless there are exceptional projects with leadership buy-in. Unless you're working on the absolute cutting-edge, you don't need every member of the team to be at the top of their game. It's happened many times in sports that a team full of too many superstars underachieves.