4 ms·
Which is not "theft" according to current legal precedent, and also common sense.
by orangecat 19d ago
Which is not "theft" according to current legal precedent, and also common sense.
- ironman1478 19d agoIt is theft under common sense.
- conz 19d agoOnly in the sense that you reading a book from the library also constitutes theft of knowledge. Does it?
- 20k 19d agoIf I stole someone's private research notes and republished them loosely in my own words, they'd correctly be pissed This was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition
- logicchains 19d ago>This was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition It was not stolen, it was willingly given.
- 20k 19d agoThe terms of service does not dictate what constitutes plagiarism
- paxys 19d agoThey are not “private research notes” if they are generated by an LLM.
- 20k 18d agoThe prompts they put in are the equivalent
- matt3210 19d agoHunting an animal would be considered ok by most, but scaling it to the point of damage is not ok according to most.
- haunter 19d agoDownload a book and you are a thief Download 1 million books and you are OpenAI
- Squarex 19d agoWhat? HN has always praised Library Genesis for example.
- an0malous 19d agoLibgen isn’t trying to sell you back the content for $100/month. No one would be complaining if OpenAI open sourced their models.
- Davidzheng 19d agothe second part is definitely not true
- an0malous 19d agoNo one's complaining about stolen content from any of the labs releasing open source models