3 ms·
> but quality of those movies go down Nothing requires this and there are plenty of counterfactuals to this claim. An artist having to sell their work to dist
by JumpCrisscross 2mo ago
> but quality of those movies go down
Nothing requires this and there are plenty of counterfactuals to this claim.
An artist having to sell their work to distributors and producers every time, versus selling their brand once and then getting carte blanche for a while, both of these are methods with benefits and downside and neither has a monopoly on great work.
> big studio will capitalize on small studio name to make bad movies
Eventually, probably. In the meantime the artist could take time otherwise spent fundraising to do what they do best.