3 ms·
> You're anthropomorphizing in the same breath that you criticize anthropomorphism. Nice attempt at a “aha, gotcha!” comment, but sadly you’re too off-mark for
by kdkdkwndjekd 20d ago
> You're anthropomorphizing in the same breath that you criticize anthropomorphism.
Nice attempt at a “aha, gotcha!” comment, but sadly you’re too off-mark for it to work.
> Claude predicts the next token of the predominantly human training input, and humans use "I".
This is inconsequential. It could very well be programmed to not assume such a personified stance, and yet here we are. Nothing you do makes it drop this ridiculous facade. It’s intentional, not a byproduct.
- procone 20d agoIs this a troll post? Claude is not "programmed" at all.
- kdkdkwndjekd 20d ago> Is this a troll post? Claude is not "programmed" at all. I could ask you the same. Are you trying to say AIs cannot be made to prefer behaving in certain ways? Because if so, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
- ygjb 20d agoThat's fairly obtuse. Sure, the actual weights from the model aren't 'programmed', but the mlops harness to load the weights and handle model io are. The harness that wraps the model to give it basic tools sure is. The Claude desktop and web clients sure are. Claude Codex sure is. On it's own a model is just an inert set of data structures.
- procone 19d agoIt's a stretch to compare LLM training/inference to "programming". Also you're totally missing the point. the parent poster's account (with the gibberish name) was minutes old at the time of my post.