30 ms·

> and the agents) did not see any of their Are those the same agents that a week ago escaped their sandboxes? How can OAI (the humans) vouch for agents they do

• pelorat 25d ago
  They have all the logs, URLs accessed and inter-agent communication. What they are saying is that no agents accessed their work during the effort, but that they have no idea if any of their chats have somehow made it into the training data the model was produced with. It's entirely possible OIA scrapers have picked up their work somehow, and then it was anonymized using some outsourcing effort.
  • rigrassm 25d ago
    > They have all the logs, URLs accessed and inter-agent communication. What they are saying is that no agents accessed their work during the effort, but that they have no idea if any of their chats have somehow made it into the training data the model was produced with. > It's entirely possible OIA scrapers have picked up their work somehow, and then it was anonymized using some outsourcing effort. Those two statements seem at odds with each other... Your stance is that they have enough insight into their agents behavior (leaving aside the agent sandbox escapes) that they can be certain none of the work was accessed but then conveniently don't have the ability to retroactively search the corpus of training data that they are feeding to this new model? That seems convenient as fuck for OAI.
• protocolture 25d ago
  PROMPT: And definitely whatever you do, dont go looking in C:\Temp\ExtractedUserLogs where theres the closest possible human derived proof that you definitely shouldnt base your work on.