4 ms·
So basically now YC is looking to emulate Trump and his "pay for early access to truth social posts" ? re: https://time.com/article/2026/08/13/trump-sued-truth
by arionhardison 1mo ago
So basically now YC is looking to emulate Trump and his "pay for early access to truth social posts" ?
re: https://time.com/article/2026/08/13/trump-sued-truth-social-posts-early-access-lawsuit-democrat-investigations/ https://time.com/article/2026/08/13/trump-sued-truth-social-...
- avaer 1mo agoYC isn't taxing you, or elected to serve your interest, or beholden to public recordkeeping law or sworn to a national constitution with explicit rules against self-enrichment. YC can do whatever they want, you can not play their game if you choose. It's not really comparable.
- ModernMech 1mo ago> YC isn't taxing you It's a different kind of tax. The VC model is to get you addicted to a service and then jack up prices as soon as they've squeezed out other competition. You can't opt out of that game when AirBnBs take over your town.
- avaer 1mo agoThat's fair and accurate, there's a lot broken with the system. But I wouldn't place the blame at the feet of YC, it would be just as bad without them.
- arionhardison 1mo ago> blame at the feet of YC, it would be just as bad without them. I disagree, I think YC is fully to blame here as are the other grifters of the current administration.
- mcmcmc 1mo agoThe problem is predatory pricing is hard to prove, and the FTC is impotent or complicit, depending on the administration
- arionhardison 1mo agoThis is a very good point, I did not mean literally in that sense; only in that they are offering "the privileged" exclusive access to information that will further entrench their positions. I apologize for not being clearer in my comment. I actually agree with your response and fully understand that there is a fundamental difference but also believe that the outcomes of both the aforementioned are aligned.
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]