4 ms·

There already is a C* : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C*

• applfanboysbgon 25d ago
  Does it matter? Is the global namespace permanently depleted because of an obscure language that nobody has used in 30 years?
  • stbenjam 25d ago
    By that logic, I think I'll create a new language called Pascal, or maybe Ada...
    • applfanboysbgon 25d ago
      Neither of those languages are obscure. If enough time passes that they become considered so, by all means there is no reason to condemn the names to an eternal graveyard.
    • Jtsummers 25d ago
      Unlike the old C* linked at the top of this particular thread, Ada is still seeing active development in its language standard and implementations and new work. Pascal (via FreePascal and Delphi, in particular) is also still maintained and in use today.
• dymk 25d ago
  That C* uses .cs, but nobody is complaining about C# using that extension That C* was released in 1993 Who actually cares about the name collision?
  • kazinator 25d ago
    Count me among those who would care about that enough to be completely dissuaded from naming a new language C*.
• deleted 25d ago
  [deleted]
• mrkeen 25d ago
  Found another one: https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~sedwards/classes/2021/4115-fall/lrms/cstar.pdf https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~sedwards/classes/2021/4115-fall... https://github.com/kkysen/cstar https://github.com/kkysen/cstar And to sibling comments: I care. Non-mainstream languages are talking points. I don't want to get 15 minutes into a "you should have effects like Koka" argument and then find out the other person is talking about a different Koka.