As a researcher in this general area I would not say 2m by 2100 is a consensus view of the worst case scenario see [1]. Here is a useful scenario for understan

As a researcher in this general area I would not say 2m by 2100 is a consensus view of the worst case scenario see [1]. Here is a useful scenario for understanding what different SLR scenarios mean for the states [2] [1] https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter-4-sea-level-rise-and-implications-for-low-lying-islands-coasts-and-communities/4-1synthesis/4-1-2future-sea-level-rise-and-implications-for-responses/ipcc-srocc-ch_4_2/ https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter-4-sea-level-rise-a... [2] https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/ https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/ ("most of the Florida peninsula will be under water in 50-100 years" is certainly not true, however, Miami would be in a very difficult spot at 2m SLR)