I truly believe AI content has some kind of 'survivor bias' in the sense when it is detected. When it is sloppy and terrible it's really noticeable, when it's w

I truly believe AI content has some kind of 'survivor bias' in the sense when it is detected. When it is sloppy and terrible it's really noticeable, when it's well done or used partially with a human you won't even notice or realize it's AI. This black/white view on content is for lazy people who do the laziest prompts and send slop without checking, editing, copywriting, improving anything. One of the biggest disappointments I found on the human race with the release of useful LLMs is the propensity to have the lowest denominator behaviour possible, be as lazy as possible and let themselves be cognitively replaced by AI, if you put in the SAME effort we used to put in before writing content, using ai tools as leverage I have no doubt it would be an improvement, we are just comparing apples to oranges when you consider the effort dispensed to write.