29 ms·
That's interesting. Some of the fandom wikis are really high quality (memory-alpha, starwars) and were my introduction to the service. I suppose I appreciate
by opello 25d ago
That's interesting. Some of the fandom wikis are really high quality (memory-alpha, starwars) and were my introduction to the service. I suppose I appreciate that someone paying for the hosting and running the wiki has to be paid for somehow. And this kind of consolidation makes it worse if the underlying provider fails, but ideally avoids that so individually hosted instances don't more silently disappear. It makes me wonder about the most reasonable balance.
I also enjoyed browsing the list of mappings:
https://github.com/IndieWikiBuddy/indie-wiki-buddy/blob/main/data/data.json https://github.com/IndieWikiBuddy/indie-wiki-buddy/blob/main...
- xerox13ster 25d agoThe user contributions may be high-quality but the site they are on is so low quality that I find the information to be of lower quality. I don’t care how well filled out it is: if the site is bad then the information is not worth my time. I say this as a Star Trek fan.