4 ms·
The reputational damage for CF would be intense. Businesses won't tolerate something like this so I find it hard to believe there is any cooperation between th
by CommanderData 26d ago
The reputational damage for CF would be intense.
Businesses won't tolerate something like this so I find it hard to believe there is any cooperation between the two entities.
- samlinnfer 26d agoThey already terminate TLS at their edge. It takes one secret court order for them to start sending data to the NSA.
- stef25 26d agoMaybe that's why the keep hosting extremist content.
- done_lurking 26d agoI thought Cloudflare generally refuses to serve those kinds of sites. What content is Cloudflare serving that is extremist?
- pocksuppet 26d agoMany torrent sites, that's a kind of extremism.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 25d agoI have seen this argument on HN before with respect to similar scenarios involving so-called "tech" companies acting as intermediaries I don't think it's convincing If this submission and this thread are any indication, it appears the "reputation" that CF customers care about has nothing to do with privacy. It relates to price, ease of use, reliability, etc. The fact is businesses do "tolerate it" For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudbleed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudbleed The MITM design of CF is what it is It creates risks, but these risks are tolerated