what strawman? do you mean, > All things AI seems to assume that more and faster is better, but there is no justification of that assumption. is good argumen

what strawman? do you mean, > All things AI seems to assume that more and faster is better, but there is no justification of that assumption. is good argument? of course faster discovery without human in the loop is better. is that not what humans have been optimizing for the past few thousand years ? faster mobility, faster communication, faster medical recovery etc. everything modern civilization has to offer is because of a rush to get better and faster. for example, discovering penicillin 2 years early would've saved ~15 million people more. why is that not worthy enough to pursue?