4 ms·
Seems like high-risk and low-reward for your network security. You could host it behind the WG interface, but… still exposing the castle’s master key to a pytho
by jchook 27d ago
Seems like high-risk and low-reward for your network security. You could host it behind the WG interface, but… still exposing the castle’s master key to a python web app.
I have found that WG client management is as simple as a couple scripts and a TSV file to match pubkeys to users.
Anyhow, cool project and I like the overall concept of respecting existing config.
- vsergione 26d agoWell, I don't rely on tools to deliver security out of the box without me knowing what is all about. Therefore, this tool is not meant to be secure by itself. I use other means to achieve that.