3 ms·
> complaining about LLM-assisted writing. I urge you to read the article. "assisted" is doing a lot of load-bearing work here. The problem is not just the writ
by exceptione 26d ago
> complaining about LLM-assisted writing.
I urge you to read the article. "assisted" is doing a lot of load-bearing work here.
The problem is not just the writing style, but rather that it doesn't make sense at all.
Take the example for PGQ. "Two ordinary tables, one graph on top of them:" The example makes zero sense, because the fucking tables aren't even there. You can't be lazier than writing a prompt: "please make a blog post about the new PostgreSQL release, and give code examples for each new feature", then ctrl-c, ctrl-v the output.
You can write articles with the most horrible style if you want, but this level of disdain for readers is beyond belief.
- valyala 26d agoYou can add the following statements in the first example and click "Run" button in order to understand the underlying tables' structure and contents mentioned in the example: SELECT * FROM person; SELECT * FROM follows; You can explore the database used in this example with any valid PostgreSQL statements.
- exceptione 26d agoOkay, that is better than I thought, can confirm it works.