4 ms·
>The Economist, Silicon Valley's primary submarine, dispels the notion that AI causes unemployment because SV has realized that the peasants get unruly. ??? F
by gruez 29d ago
>The Economist, Silicon Valley's primary submarine, dispels the notion that AI causes unemployment because SV has realized that the peasants get unruly.
???
From a few months ago: https://www.economist.com/content-assets/images/20260516_DE_US.jpg https://www.economist.com/content-assets/images/20260516_DE_...
- AnimalMuppet 29d agoI suspect "submarine" was meant in this sense: https://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html https://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html Note well: This does not mean that I agree with any part of what he said. Just explaining the term.
- lioeters 29d agoEvery single aspect of that cover is manipulative marketing.
- gruez 29d agoRight, but OP's implication is that they're trying to placate the masses (that somehow read the economist?), even though a few months before they were putting out alarmist covers. You can't have it both ways. If you're arguing that economist being pro-job loss is part of a globalist conspiracy and so is the economist being anti-job loss, then you just created an unfalsifiable statement, a "heads I win, tails you lose" argument.
- rent_a_shill 29d agoThat was when Silicon Valley still favored the job loss narrative to drive up CEO interest for AI. Now protests are getting louder and the midterms are close.