4 ms·

> Nobody wants to watch robots play chess against each other - we watch human chess even though bots are better Many humans have studied robots play chess and

> Nobody wants to watch robots play chess against each other - we watch human chess even though bots are better Many humans have studied robots play chess and learned from them. For example the concept of a "thorn pawn" was popularized after Leela played it with great success. > Nobody needs math that has not been verified by humans. There already are proofs that are understood by a handful of humans; without understanding you can still proof corollaries. For example, there are proofs to theorems that are conditional on the Riemann Hypothesis.

chr15m 26d ago
> Many humans have studied robots play chess and learned from them. Yes, robot chess is very useful for chess players. It's a great technology. People don't want to watch robot chess. They want to watch humans, even those who used AI to train. The human part of chess is what matters. > There already are proofs that are understood by a handful of humans Yes, exactly.
- Mr_Minderbinder 26d ago
  > People don't want to watch robot chess. I do and I have for a number of years. Most people prefer to watch human chess but there are also those who watch computer chess with the same level of enthusiasm: https://tcec-chess.com/ https://tcec-chess.com/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCEC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCEC