So, exponent of <category> would state (if rationalized) that aggregate of <category> has weak judgement, and not considering the apparent paradox of suggesting

So, exponent of <category> would state (if rationalized) that aggregate of <category> has weak judgement, and not considering the apparent paradox of suggesting weak judgement about herself, implies recommending a restriction of power for members of said <category>. If the proponent stated that members of <category> have no judgement, than the proponent has no right to judge. If the proponent implied that there exist exceptions, then it has to explain how to manage the exceptions in fairness.