4 ms·
And then when the evidence does not match up, he fudges with one of his parameters, V, to "explain" it.
by aszepieniec 14y ago
And then when the evidence does not match up, he fudges with one of his parameters, V, to "explain" it.
- mattraibert 14y agoThis seems like a non-sequitur. The gp's criticism was that the article doesn't cite any evidence for the model, which he does. Besides, he doesn't "fudge" V. He shows evidence: that violent crime decreased over the relevant period and argues that less violent crime implies lower average tendency to violence (V).