3 ms·
> He prosecuted them, and chose fines over criminal punishments. So no actual prosecution, none worthy of considering prevention. Predominantly citizens being
by DANmode 1mo ago
> He prosecuted them, and chose fines over criminal punishments.
So no actual prosecution, none worthy of considering prevention.
Predominantly citizens being hit.
> You say all these random facts
Financial institutions paying out lottery jackpots to members of administrations that didn’t meaningfully harm them is far from random.
> What happened in 1600s has zero bearing on what happens today
Unchecked ignorance. Go about your business.
- hakunin 1mo ago> What happened in 1600s has zero bearing on what happens today Unchecked ignorance. What relevant examples of getting away with corruption can we glean from a pre-enlightenment, pre-formal-police, pre-constitution, pre-checks-and-balances, pre-judiciary-act, pre-telegraph, pre-paper-trail, pre-free-journalism, pre-internet, pre-camera-phones, pre-surveillance, pre-data-centers, pre-whistleblowers, pre-structures of accountability world? Corruption has gotten magnitudes harder to get away with (even since 00s), which is why history is irrelevant here. You would need something extraordinary, like becoming a president with criminal immunity and self-pardon powers, and getting an electoral majority to support you being openly corrupt.